Life Design Ezine>
I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU MEAN

July 1, 2008

"When people honor each other, there is a trust established 
that leads to synergy, interdependence, and deep respect. 
Both parties make decisions and choices based on what is 
right, what is best, what is valued most highly."  
~ Blaine Lee 
 
Comprehending people who are not exactly like me seems to 
have taken a lifetime. But, I’m learning that such 
understanding is the key to connecting with professional 
colleagues and loved ones as well. Not everyone grew up 
having family dinner conversations that were tantamount to 
hockey games rather than patient inquiries around the table 
regarding the highs and lows everyone’s day. Communication 
styles that each of us “fall into” have grown up the same 
ways that we have. At present, most of us tend to embody 
moods, styles, and motivations that gave us the most 
attention as kids. You may witness this truism emerge, 
organically, at any business meeting, networking lunch or 
other small group occasion. 
 
From my work as a career counselor since 2006, I’ve found 
that among the multiple ways we express ourselves in 
relationship, there are a few main styles that tend to 
emerge within the first hour of counseling. Learning how to 
listen and observe the unique expression of others—i.e., 
read people for style—can help in the search for mutual 
understanding. Being a quick study of each person’s style 
is one very important way I improve my capacity to connect. 
 
 
In the 1980’s, a great deal of literature emerged that 
spoke of increasing your “EQ” or emotional intelligence. In 
1991, with the sexual harassment case of Anita Hill by 
Clarence Thomas and lawsuits of discrimination getting 
greater publicity, cultivating a wider-consciousness in the 
workplace became an urgent concern.  
 
Some companies and institutions made mandatory “diversity” 
workshops, gender issues education, race-consciousness 
seminars and personality questionnaires where the results 
were collectively explored. At such events, participants 
are encouraged to observe their own and others’ 
communication styles for differences in processing what 
"different ways of knowing" occur between men and women, 
people from different ethnic and social groups, and 
workplace colleagues and supervisors. In many places, tacit 
“laws” arose that hovered in lunchrooms and over water 
coolers: “Be polite or at least tolerate people who are not 
you.” 
 
The initial aim of using these personality temperament 
sorters was to help people “awaken” to their own style or 
relational temperament. But, learning about the style (and 
temperamental differences) of others had not been 
emphasized until very recently.  
 
As someone who taught comparative religions for 12 years, 
most of what I covered in class related to learning about 
people who are “not us.” I urged students to “bracket” 
self-interest—their psychological narcissism—for the 
semester. The question with which I would begin class was: 
“What do other intelligent people around the world value 
and defend as true or most important?” As a career 
counselor, I’m learning to integrate two vital ways of 
knowing and remaining curious—to keep learning about others 
and deepen understanding of self in relation to others.  
 
Learning about your own style and studying the temperaments 
of others, especially in relation to communication, can be 
the smartest ways for successful networking.  
Often, when we do what comes naturally we alienate others 
without realizing it. Why? Because our behavior and 
communicative style may not be natural for them. For a 
relationship of mutual understanding to work, we have to 
become aware of our natural tendencies in relation to 
others’ natural preferences. When we can defuse the 
extremes of our behavior we can avoid sabotaging ourselves. 
We do this by quickly identifying the individual needs of 
others based on the behavioral signals they will send to 
us, and then adapting our own behavior to make them feel 
comfortable, heard and understood.  
 
With insight, we can recognize when our own style works and 
does not when trying to connect with others—knowing that we 
can “auto-correct” and psycho-socially “attune” to the 
other at any point in any conversation.  
 
Isn’t connecting with others is the point of all 
interactions? 
 
Connecting with, and understanding, others as a prime 
directive may be a Copernican revolution for some of us, 
i.e., if you were raised by a character like Tony Soprano, 
winning or surviving any conflict may be your default style 
whenever there’s conflict or tension. Sometimes the context 
may not be conflict-ridden, and yet you’ll still assume 
that all interactions will have a winner and a loser and 
you’ll play the role, (and take the outcome), that you 
always did as a child. Habitual thinking rarely works out 
for the good. But, our historically-ingrained styles of 
interacting can be transformed with greater awareness, 
understanding, and the humility to keep learning. 
 
The key objective is to understand your own communication 
style and to be able to quickly and accurately identify the 
style of others; then adapt so that you treat others the 
way they want to be treated. 
 
An organizational psychology firm entitled The Platinum 
Rule Group offers a quick overview of the four most common 
behavioral styles and a brief description of how the more 
extreme behaviors of each style may be perceived by others. 
I’ve added some of my own experiences of these types below: 
 
 
The Director Style: This style is driven by two governing 
needs: (1) the need to control and (2) the need to 
achieve. They are goal-oriented go-getters who are most 
comfortable when they are in charge of people and 
situations. They want to accomplish many things now, so 
they focus on no-nonsense approaches to bottom-line 
results. The Director style seeks expedience and is not 
afraid to bend the rules or “get a B+” rather than strive 
endlessly—causing a delay—on behalf of the god called 
“perfection.” They figure it is easier to beg forgiveness 
than to ask permission. They accept challenges, take 
authority, and plunge headfirst into solving problems. They 
take charge in a crisis, are fast-paced, task-oriented, and 
work quickly and impressively by themselves—meaning they 
become annoyed with delays.  
 
The Director’s weakness, in a word, is “steamrolling” 
others, forcing outcomes, and insisting: “my way or the 
highway!” 
 
The Socializer Style: This style is friendly, 
enthusiastic, true “pack animals." They like to be where 
the action is. Like divas or male models, they thrive on 
the admiration, acknowledgment, and compliments that come 
with being in the limelight. They just want to have fun. 
They are more relationship-oriented than task-oriented. 
They would rather "schmooze" with colleagues over lunch 
than work in the office. This style’s strengths are 
enthusiasm, charm, persuasiveness, and warmth. They are 
gifted in people skills and communicate naturally and 
persuasively with individuals as well as groups. They are 
idea-people and dreamers who excel at getting others 
excited about their vision. They are optimists with an 
abundance of charisma.  
 
The Socializer’s weakness is “speeding to be 
omnipotent/omnipresent.” They try to do too much too 
quickly, and, as a consequence, miss important details. 
 
The Relater Style: This style is warm, supportive, and 
nurturing. They are the most people-oriented of the four 
styles. The Relater styles are excellent listeners, devoted 
friends, and loyal employees. Their relaxed disposition 
makes them approachable and warm. They develop strong 
networks of people who are willing to be mutually 
supportive and reliable. The Relater styles are excellent 
team players and tend to be risk-averse. When the Relater 
styles are faced with change, they need to think it 
through, plan, and accept it into their world. They, more 
than the other behavioral types, strive to maintain 
personal composure, stability, and balance. Relater styles 
are courteous, friendly, and willing to share 
responsibilities. They are good planners, persistent 
workers, and good with follow-through. They can be slow 
decision-makers because of their need for 
security-through-approval, their need to avoid risk, and 
their desire to include others in the decision-making 
process. 
 
The Relater’s weakness is being “overly-cautious” and 
hypersensitive—processing decisions slowly and searching 
for everybody’s “buy in” feels necessary for them to move 
forward. 
 
The Thinker Style: This style is analytical, persistent, 
and systematic. They enjoy problem solving and are 
detail-oriented, which makes them more concerned with 
content than style. Thinkers have high expectations of 
themselves and others, which can make them overly critical. 
Their tendency toward perfectionism – taken to an extreme – 
can cause “paralysis by over-analysis.” They are slow and 
deliberate decision-makers. They do research, make 
comparisons, determine risks, calculate margins of error, 
and then take action. The Thinker style becomes irritated 
by surprises and glitches, hence their cautious 
decision-making. The Thinker styles are also skeptical, so 
they like to see promises in writing. The Thinker styles’ 
strengths include an eye for detail and accuracy, 
dependability, independence, persistence, follow-through, 
and organization. They are good listeners and ask a lot of 
questions; however, they run the risk of missing the forest 
for the trees. 
 
Thinker’s weakness: paralyzing perfectionism, impatience 
with human error (others), and inflexibility. 
 
WHAT TO DO? 
 
“To observe without distortion is only possible if there is 
complete attention with your body, your nerves, your mind, 
your heart, your ears. Then there is only attention.” ~ J. 
Krishnamurti  
 
An important caveat to remember, applying these insights to 
your relationships with great focus doesn’t mean you throw 
yourself and your unique style under the bus! Rather, it 
means working more skillfully with your own 
potentially-alienating tendencies in conversation to 
more-skillfully connect with others—those who may have a 
different style than your own. "Connecting” with others 
means "getting into their world" in a way that reflects and 
speaks to their style.  
 
For example, as a Director, if I'm speaking with a Relater, 
I'm going to be very watchful to resist interrupting. I'm 
going to work hard to do the following: ask open-ended 
questions, listen patiently as they process information, 
work on making eye contact, use the exact feeling words 
that they use, and respond more slowly than I would if I 
were with my own "Director"-oriented friends. 
 
If I'm a Relater, I'm going to prefer meeting with people 
in a quiet place, one-on-one, to hear and respond 
thoughtfully to what they’re saying and mirror back to them 
the specific content of their priorities and concerns. 
 
With “bottom-line” Director-types, speaking directly to the 
point in a quick, short, content-relevant sentences will be 
more effective. Going on and on with long stories and 
slow-to-the-point, and thick descriptions will make that 
exchange the very last one.  
 
Thinkers require accuracy, rigor, relevant information, 
specific details and little-to-no “back story.” Small talk 
at “meet and greet” mixers feels like torture to them. As a 
matter of fact, they might not even attend a networking 
event unless it’s a virtual one!  
 
Socializers love to yack it up, dominate the discussion, 
interrupt and be interrupted (it means they’re alive!), 
keep it light and move along speedily. They just love the 
buzz of networking and meeting interesting people whom they 
might or might not want to work with in the future. When 
they exchange business cards, they may even follow up if 
they don’t lose them among the hundred that they’ve 
collected by the end of the event. Their work with any of 
the other types would be to slow down, keep their sharing 
brief and relevant and focus mainly on the other person’s 
interests through open-ended, warm-hearted investigating. 
 
Being able to interrupt the flood of unconscious habits 
that may have “worked” in your own home or amongst your own 
“type” can be extremely gratifying and even more helpful 
for the ones who are not exactly like you—those with whom 
you are trying to build a mutually-rewarding connection. 
 
HOW IMPORTANT IS THIS? 
 
A 1998 study was conducted at the famous Bell Labs Think 
Tank in Princeton, New Jersey. Researchers surveyed teams 
of electrical engineers. They (both women and men) were 
asked to name the most valued and productive engineers on 
the teams. Surprisingly, those who were named were not the 
people with the highest IQs, or the highest academic 
credentials or the best scores on achievement tests. The 
most valued team members were the people whose social 
intelligence, or adaptability, was highest. 
 
"To have real conversation with people may seem like such a 
simple, obvious suggestion, but it involves courage and 
risk." ~ Thomas Moore 
 
The key to building successful relationships of all kinds 
is humility, curiosity and the willingness to risk action.  
 
 
Adaptable people realize there is a difference between 
their “self” (who they are) and their “behavior” (how they 
choose to act). Adaptable people are awake to themselves 
in relation to others, so they consciously decide whether 
and how to respond to a person, a situation, or an event.  
 
Less adaptable people, on the other hand, respond in a more 
ingrained, unconscious manner, regardless of whether the 
response is likely to be appropriate or effective. But 
even if you are a person who’s been wedded to your own 
style for a very long time, fancying yourself a rugged 
individual, there is hope. You can commit to broader 
understanding of others and yourself and learn to be more 
adaptable, more capable of successful intimacy. When you 
understand each of the four styles, how to recognize them 
in others, and how to adapt to them in key ways, you can 
have greater ease in almost any interpersonal situation. 
 
Whether someone is male or female, young or old, part of a 
Western culture or some other, our behavioral style is 
often evident. Let’s face it, we may all be created equal 
and want to be treated with dignity but we surely do not 
want to be treated as if we were all the same, 
temperamentally. What may be a smart response or reaction 
toward one person and in one context may be totally wrong 
for the very next person in another context. 
 
Imagine the benefits of understanding how to treat people 
the way they want to be treated! Shaky relationships can 
suddenly become good ones. Good relationships can now be 
even better than before.  
_____________________________  
 
Let's keep this conversation going. I would love to help 
you understand the results of any of these free temperament 
sorters online – found on my website. See my "Favorite 
Links" page.