Life Design Ezine>
STEERING BY STARLIGHT

November 1, 2008

My readers may have heard of best-selling author Martha 
Beck through her advice column in "Oprah Magazine" or 
through her many books: "Expecting Adam," "The Joy Diet," 
"Leaving the Saints," "Finding Your North Star," or" Four 
Day Win"–all available at my favorite independent bookstore 
Powell’s Books. "Psychology Today," "NPR" and "USA Today" 
consider Martha “the best known Life Coach in America.” 
Beck is a very straightforward writer who believes each 
person has an “inner-compass” and has available to them 
“limitless possibilities” to help them locate their “just 
right” lives. 
 
I have envied Martha Beck for a long time and was motivated 
to choose the profession of “Life Direction Coach” because 
of her own courage to do so. At present, she now calls 
herself a “personal trainer” saying, “I work with healthy 
people to help them achieve maximum fitness–that is, 
well-being and quality of life.” After being professors, 
both Martha and I chose to forego the prestige of 
upper-crust academia as well as to abandon our restrictive 
and misogynous religions’-of-origin. 
 
Both Beck and I have conducted research in China and–-in 
our advice giving–-we tend to use the three great Chinese 
philosophies of Daoism, Buddhism and, Confucianism (with a 
feminist slant, obviously!). Just like Beck, I received my 
graduate degree from an Ivy League School in the early 
1990s and published research that was focused on women, 
social-psychology and religion. 
 
It seems that we were “separated at birth” because of our 
pasts, because we both like to write helpful books, and 
because we each regularly publish essays offering personal 
and practical advice. But enough about our common threads 
in the great garment of life; it is more important to 
convey the unique messages of her latest book, "Steering by 
Starlight." 
 
"Steering by Starlight," according to its introduction, is 
about “finding and following the life you were meant to 
live: your highest and happiest possible destiny.” The 
theory that Beck uses is much like the multitude of helpful 
books on business and self-help shelves. She assumes, along 
with much Ancient Greek and Indian Philosophy, that there 
exists a fundamental purpose to everyone’s life and 
believes that we all have a particular "dharma" (in an 
Indian-philosophical sense). If we ignore this elemental 
calling (or dharma) we will be thwarted. 
 
When I say “thwarted” I mean we will feel “ill at ease” 
until we honor our “true selves” or our “innate 
destiny”–something that will forever follow us, haunt us, 
and hunt us down until we honor its mandates. 
 
I can see why Beck left behind her position as a sociology 
instructor at Harvard University because her hope-filled 
theories would be critically eviscerated at any academic 
conference. Why? Because Beck’s fundamental beliefs would 
be considered "totalizing," "essentialist," simplistic and 
a typical example of the naively Western grand narrative of 
humanism (a fallacious sense of unlimited mastery--not 
unlike the U.S. administration's current empire building in 
the Middle East). 
 
The great 20th-century French sociologist/philosopher, 
Michel Foucault, would shame Beck for mimicking the 
homogenizing, colonizing and mono-mythic paradigms of the 
uniquely-American project called the “Human Potential 
Movement” (HPM). 
 
To wit: HPM was a superbly optimistic movement that arose 
out of the social and intellectual milieu of the 1960s and 
was formed around the concept that humans could cultivate 
their “extraordinary potential.” Its advocates believed 
that this unique "buried treasure" lay largely unexplored 
by most people. The movement took as its premise that in 
discovering, developing and releasing one’s "inner 
potential" she/he could experience an exceptional quality 
of life filled with simplicity, happiness, creativity and 
abundant fulfillment.  
 
Why would Foucault reject such an optimistic theory? In 
brief, (and if he were alive), he would accuse Beck for 
proffering “a reductionistic fantasy” that assumes humans 
could be "hygienic" individuals who live unaffected by 
their surroundings. He would mock the romantic idea that 
people, by muscular will alone, would be able to “throw 
off” the multiple cultural influences operating within and 
all around them. If readers are interested in learning more 
about Foucauldian frameworks, I’ll offer these in another 
book review (I promise)! 
 
But, if you must read an alternative to this common 
(reductionistic) mistake in career-advice literature, read 
my very favorite business book this year called "Working 
Identity: Unconventional Strategies for Reinventing Your 
Career" by a very plain-speaking French sociologist and 
philosopher named Herminia Ibarra.  
 
Like Foucault, Ibarra does not subscribe to the fashionable 
belief in humanistic (or pop-) psychology, i.e., that there 
is a singular treasure, a "pearl of great price" (for 
Christians) or a "soul or self" (for the Greeks) within all 
of us that will point us to the "just right" work that we 
are each meant to do. Rather, she urges readers to 
experiment and even play with their identities-–which she 
says are always multiple and naturally morphing according 
to whatever social-context or in which ever job we find 
ourselves.  
 
For Ibarra, such multiplicity need not be “read” 
pathologically nor must it cause a baffling crisis of 
identity. Rather, if accepted, this fluidity of “self” can 
be freeing, relationally-responsive, dynamic, intimate and 
spontaneously-inventive. 
 
Even though Martha Beck has abandoned her “pomo” 
philosophies, I find her work unique and quite 
forward-thinking when she turns to the latest research in 
psychiatry, neurology and related fields for the ruts we 
can return to and the ways we might change these phenomena. 
 
Like me, Beck writes in a way that will speak to anyone 
with a ninth-grade education–-the target audience, in terms 
of literacy, of the average person who buys self-help 
books. For instance, she keeps her writing teacherly and 
repetitive; she identifies and reiterates three simple 
stages along the vocational path to recapturing a 
satisfying life that include: 
 
* “the stargazer” a metaphor that helps readers understand 
why it’s so easy to lose themselves in an endless quest for 
self-knowledge; she offers strategies for sighting their 
“North Star” (a trope of her earliest career book and 
career workbook called, "Finding Your North Star"); 
 
* “the mapmaker” a simile used to evaluate one’s unbearable 
situation in order to plot a different course for the 
future; 
 
* “the pathfinder” which explores the “adventures” or 
trials that may be encountered as one travels along their 
ever-challenging, new life course. 
 
Whether one is seeking better relationships, more focused 
career direction, physical fitness or to create a more 
harmonious lifestyle, "Steering by Starlight’s" stories, 
experiential references, and up-to-date, neuro-scientific 
evidence will guide HPM believers to “actualize their human 
potential,” uncover their own “inner compass,” and perhaps, 
find their way in the world. 
 
Note: Even though I may sound a little sassy in this 
review, I appreciate Beck's courage, humor, and 
approachable framework; I use her framework often as a 
creative life-direction consultant, in my own Life Design 
Publishing business as well as in my writing [see 
http://LDUpublishing.com]. 
 
Question: What do you think about your own potential? Are 
you cynical about change or are you hopeful about releasing 
possibilities for vocational transformation? You might want 
to order another helpful book for those seeking wisdom for 
those “in transition” called: Polishing the Mirror: 90 
Days to Vocational Clarity. Order Now via my publications 
page: 
http://www.lifedesignunlimited.citymax.com/Publications.html